1 of 1 people found this helpful
I like the 2v2 idea, though I wouldn't change a thing about how cards are discarded when there's no space for them in hand.
Milling others out of their decks is a opener to alot of stratergies. Though blue really doesn't need that much more draw, we would prefer if we could crowd control the board a little better. ANd I can speak for Endurance players that they would prefer if non-guard creatures got 1 health too.
Thumbsup nonetheless, good post!
2 of 2 people found this helpful
I wish that the vs. battles randomized the lanes instead of only having the same shadow on the right, nothing on the left. When you play solo arena there are so many different types of lanes and it keeps game play interesting. Just a thought...
Berserk is a poor name for the effect your suggesting, a real Norse berzerker basically runs into battle with no regard for self defense, a word like 'shield' would be more appropriate.
Very much like any kind of 2v2 option, though I expect UI would be difficult and I coordinating with allies would be hard. I did a lot of MtG 2v2 and 3v3 games, operating on a shared team life pool is better because it keeps everyone in the game until the end.
I VERY much like randomizing lanes and will be posting a thread with some ideas of my own in this area soon.